Image for Cardiovascular Physiology Concepts, Richard E Klabunde PhD

Cardiovascular Physiology Concepts

Richard E. Klabunde, PhD


Also Visit

Cardiovascular Physiology Concepts textbook cover

Click here for information on Cardiovascular Physiology Concepts, 2nd edition, a textbook published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins (2011)

Cardiovascular Physiology Concepts textbook cover

Click here for information on Normal and Abnormal Blood Pressure, a textbook published by Richard E. Klabunde (2013)


Cardiac Muscle Force-Velocity Relationship


Description of Force-Velocity Relationship

cardiac muscle force-velocity relationship

The length-tension relationship examines how changes in preload affect isometric tension development. Generally, when a muscle fiber contracts, it also shortens so that external work can be performed. If we were to isolate a piece of cardiac muscle and study the effects of afterload on the velocity of fiber shortening, we would find that the greater the afterload, the slower the velocity of shortening (see Figure). The classical study describing the force-velocity relationship for cardiac muscle was published by Edmund Sonnenblick in 1962 using cat papillary muscles. We all experience this, for example, when we lift heavy versus light objects. The heavier the object that we lift, the slower our muscles contract.  In summary, there is an inverse relationship between shortening velocity and afterload.

The x-intercept in the force-velocity relationship represents the point at which the afterload is so great that the muscle fiber cannot shorten, and therefore represents the maximal isometric force. The y-intercept represents an extrapolated value for the maximal velocity of shortening (Vmax) that would be achieved if there were no afterload. The value was extrapolated by Sonnenblick because it cannot be measured experimentally because the papillary muscle preparation cannot contract without a finite preload, which becomes the afterload during shortening in the absence of an additional afterload.

It is important to note that a cardiac muscle fiber does not operate on a single force-velocity curve. This relationship is altered by changes in both preload and inotropy. The former shares some similarities with skeletal muscle; the latter, however, is unique to cardiac muscle.

How Preload Affects the Force-Velocity Relationship

cardiac muscle force-velocity relationship

If preload is increased, cardiac muscle fibers will have a greater velocity of shortening at a given afterload (see figure). Conversely, if preload decreases, the velocity of shortening decreases at a given afterload. This occurs because the length-tension relationship dictates that as the preload is increased, there is an increase in active tension development. Once the fiber begins to shorten, the increased tension generating capability at the increased preload results in a greater velocity of shortening. In other words, increasing the preload enables to muscle to contract faster against a given afterload. Note that increasing preload increases the maximal isometric force (Fmax), as well as increases the shortening velocity at a given afterload, but does not alter not alter Vmax.


How Inotropy Affects the Force-Velocity Relationship

cardiac muscle force-velocity relationship

Changes in inotropy also alter the force-velocity relationship. If the inotropic state of the cardiac fiber is increased, there is a parallel shift in the force-velocity curve such that there is an increase in both Vmax and in maximal isometric force (Fmax) (figure 3). The increase in velocity at any given preload results from the increased  inotropy enhancing force generation by the actin and myosin filaments, and increasing the rate of cross bridge turnover. The increase in Vmax is particularly noteworthy because Vmax represents the intrinsic capability of a muscle fiber to generate force independent of load. Therefore, Vmax is sometimes used in experiments as an index or measure of inotropy for a muscle fiber.

Revised 07/07/2015

DISCLAIMER: These materials are for educational purposes only, and are not a source of medical decision-making advice.